Similarity values obtained by G-SESAME
| | ARO1 | ARO2 | ARO3 | ARO4 |
| ARO1 | | 0.437 | 0.411 | 0.411 |
| ARO2 | | | 0.235 | 0.235 |
| ARO3 | | | | 1 |
| ARO4 | | | | |
Clustering results obtained by G-SESAME
| Threshold | Initial | 1.000 | 0.430 | 0.410 |
Clustering
Result |
|
|
|
|
Similarity values obtained by Resnik's method
| | ARO1 | ARO2 | ARO3 | ARO4 |
| ARO1 | | 2.601 | 1.214 | 1.214 |
| ARO2 | | | 0.281 | 0.281 |
| ARO3 | | | | 5.496 |
| ARO4 | | | | |
Clustering results obtained by Resnik's method
| Threshold | Initial | 5.497 | 2.597 | 1.197 |
Clustering
Result |
|
|
|
|
Analysis:
The similarity values and clustering results obtained by Resnik's method are very similar to those obtained by G-SESAME.
Conclusion:
Both methods are equal.