Similarity values obtained by G-SESAME
| | MET2 | MET17 | CYS4 | CYS3 |
| MET2 | | 0.228 | 0.128 | 0.155 |
| MET17 | | | 0.480 | 0.401 |
| CYS4 | | | | 0.398 |
| CYS3 | | | | |
Clustering results obtained by G-SESAME
| Threshold | Initial | 0.480 | 0.400 | 0.220 |
Clustering
Result |
|
|
|
|
Similarity values obtained by Resnik's method
| | MET2 | MET17 | CYS4 | CYS3 |
| MET2 | | 1.013 | 0.281 | 0.281 |
| MET17 | | | 3.010 | 1.013 |
| CYS4 | | | | 1.378 |
| CYS3 | | | | |
Clustering results obtained by Resnik's method
| Threshold | Initial | 3.010 | 1.310 | 1.010 |
Clustering
Result |
|
|
|
|
Analysis:
The similarity values and clustering results obtained by Resnik's method are very similar to those obtained by G-SESAME.
Conclusion:
Both methods are equal.