Similarity values obtained by G-SESAME
| | FAS2 | CEM1 | OAR1 |
| FAS2 | | 0.690 | 0.713 |
| CEM1 | | | 0.714 |
| OAR1 | | | |
Clustering results obtained by G-SESAME
| Threshold | Initial | 0.710 |
Clustering
Result |
|
|
Similarity values obtained by Resnik's method
| | FAS2 | CEM1 | OAR1 |
| FAS2 | | 4.000 | 4.813 |
| CEM1 | | | 4.873 |
| OAR1 | | | |
Clustering results obtained by Resnik's method
| Threshold | Initial | 4.874 | 4.774 |
Clustering
Result |
|
|
|
Analysis:
These three genes are very close in their molecular functions according to the annotation information
in the pathway and in the gene ontology database. The similarity values and the clustering
results obtained by both Resnik's method and G-SESAME are very similar.
Conclusion:
Both methods are equal.