34. gluconeogenesis

Similarity values obtained by G-SESAME:

  MAE1 PYC1 PYC2 MDH2 PCK1 ENO1 ENO2 GPM1 PGK1 TDH1 TDH2 TDH3 FBA1 FBP1 PGI1
MAE1  0.2350.2350.6570.1730.1990.1990.1990.1800.2940.2940.2940.1990.1540.199
PYC1    10.2110.2060.2350.2350.2350.2110.2060.2060.2060.2350.1850.235
PYC2      0.2110.2060.2350.2350.2350.2110.2060.2060.2060.2350.1850.235
MDH2        0.1570.1800.1800.1800.1640.2660.2660.2660.1800.1390.180
PCK1          0.2940.2940.1730.1570.1490.1490.1490.4450.1300.173
ENO1            10.1990.1800.1730.1730.1730.3380.1540.199
ENO2              0.1990.1800.1730.1730.1730.3380.1540.199
GPM1                0.1800.1730.1730.1730.1990.1540.338
PGK1                  0.1570.1570.1570.1800.1390.180
TDH1                    110.1730.1300.173
TDH2                      10.1730.1300.173
TDH3                        0.1730.1300.173
FBA1                          0.1540.199
FBP1                            0.154
PGI1                             

Clustering results obtained by G-SESAME:

Threshold Initial1.0000.6500.4400.3300.2900.2300.2100.180
Clustering
Result
MDH2

MAE1

TDH3

TDH2

TDH1

FBA1

PCK1

ENO2

ENO1

PGI1

GPM1

PYC2

PYC1

PGK1

FBP1

MDH2

MAE1

TDH3
TDH2
TDH1

FBA1

PCK1

ENO2
ENO1

PGI1

GPM1

PYC2
PYC1

PGK1

FBP1

MDH2
MAE1

TDH3
TDH2
TDH1

FBA1

PCK1

ENO2
ENO1

PGI1

GPM1

PYC2
PYC1

PGK1

FBP1

MDH2
MAE1

TDH3
TDH2
TDH1

FBA1
PCK1

ENO2
ENO1

PGI1

GPM1

PYC2
PYC1

PGK1

FBP1

MDH2
MAE1

TDH3
TDH2
TDH1

FBA1
PCK1
ENO2
ENO1

PGI1
GPM1

PYC2
PYC1

PGK1

FBP1

MDH2
MAE1
TDH3
TDH2
TDH1

FBA1
PCK1
ENO2
ENO1

PGI1
GPM1

PYC2
PYC1

PGK1

FBP1

MDH2
MAE1
TDH3
TDH2
TDH1
FBA1
PCK1
ENO2
ENO1
PGI1
GPM1
PYC2
PYC1

PGK1

FBP1

MDH2
MAE1
TDH3
TDH2
TDH1
FBA1
PCK1
ENO2
ENO1
PGI1
GPM1
PYC2
PYC1
PGK1

FBP1

MDH2
MAE1
TDH3
TDH2
TDH1
FBA1
PCK1
ENO2
ENO1
PGI1
GPM1
PYC2
PYC1
PGK1
FBP1

Similarity values obtained by Resnik's method:

  MAE1 PYC1 PYC2 MDH2 PCK1 ENO1 ENO2 GPM1 PGK1 TDH1 TDH2 TDH3 FBA1 FBP1 PGI1
MAE1   0.281 0.281 4.923 0.281 0.281 0.281 0.281 0.281 1.378 1.378 1.378 0.281 0.281 0.281
PYC1     7.392 0.281 0.281 0.281 0.281 0.281 0.281 0.281 0.281 0.281 0.281 0.281 0.281
PYC2       0.281 0.281 0.281 0.281 0.281 0.281 0.281 0.281 0.281 0.281 0.281 0.281
MDH2         0.281 0.281 0.281 0.281 0.281 1.378 1.378 1.378 0.281 0.281 0.281
PCK1           1.378 1.378 0.281 0.281 0.281 0.281 0.281 4.374 0.281 0.281
ENO1             5.529 0.281 0.281 0.281 0.281 0.281 1.378 0.281 0.281
ENO2               0.281 0.281 0.281 0.281 0.281 1.378 0.281 0.281
GPM1                 0.281 0.281 0.281 0.281 0.281 0.281 1.378
PGK1                   0.281 0.281 0.281 0.281 0.281 0.281
TDH1                     7.935 7.935 0.281 0.281 0.281
TDH2                       7.935 0.281 0.281 0.281
TDH3                         0.281 0.281 0.281
FBA1                           0.281 0.281
FBP1                             0.281
PGI1                              

Clustering results obtained by Resnik's method:

Threshold Initial 7.935 7.335 5.435 4.835 4.335 1.335 0.235
Clustering
Result
FBA1

PCK1

ENO2

ENO1

MDH2

MAE1

TDH3

TDH2

TDH1

PGI1

GPM1

PYC2

PYC1

FBP1

PGK1

FBA1

PCK1

ENO2

ENO1

MDH2

MAE1

TDH3
TDH2
TDH1

PGI1

GPM1

PYC2

PYC1

FBP1

PGK1

FBA1

PCK1

ENO2

ENO1

MDH2

MAE1

TDH3
TDH2
TDH1

PGI1

GPM1

PYC2
PYC1

FBP1

PGK1

FBA1

PCK1

ENO2
ENO1

MDH2

MAE1

TDH3
TDH2
TDH1

PGI1

GPM1

PYC2
PYC1

FBP1

PGK1

FBA1

PCK1

ENO2
ENO1

MDH2
MAE1

TDH3
TDH2
TDH1

PGI1

GPM1

PYC2
PYC1

FBP1

PGK1

FBA1
PCK1

ENO2
ENO1

MDH2
MAE1

TDH3
TDH2
TDH1

PGI1

GPM1

PYC2
PYC1

FBP1

PGK1

FBA1
PCK1
ENO2
ENO1

MDH2
MAE1
TDH3
TDH2
TDH1

PGI1
GPM1

PYC2
PYC1

FBP1

PGK1

FBA1
PCK1
ENO2
ENO1
MDH2
MAE1
TDH3
TDH2
TDH1
PGI1
GPM1
PYC2
PYC1
FBP1
PGK1

 

Analysis:

Genes TDH1, TDH2, and TDH3 are annotated by the same molecular function term GO:0004365: glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (phosphorylating) activity. Genes ENO1 and ENO2 are annotated by the same molecular function term GO:0004634: phosphopyruvate hydratase activity. Genes PYC1 and PYC2 are annotated by the same molecular function term GO:0004736: pyruvate carboxylase activity. Thus, TDH1, TDH2, and TDH3 have the same molecular function. ENO1 and ENO2 have the same molecular function. PYC1 and PYC2 have the same molecular function. The similarity values and clustering results obtained by G-SESAME are consistent with these observations.

However, based on Resnik's method, the similarity among genes TDH1, TDH2, and TDH3 is greater than the similarity between PYC1 and PYC2. The similarity between PYC1 and PYC2 is greater than the similarity between ENO1 and ENO2. These results are inconsistent with the human perception.

Conclusion:

G-SESAME is better.