Similarity values obtained by G-SESAME
| | TGL1 | TGL2 | ATG15 |
| TGL1 | | 0.790 | 0.909 |
| TGL2 | | | 0.869 |
| ATG15 | | | |
Clustering results obtained by G-SESAME
| Threshold | Initial | 0.900 | 0.860 |
Clustering
Result |
|
|
|
Similarity values obtained by Resnik's method
| | TGL1 | TGL2 | ATG15 |
| TGL1 | | 4.732 | 4.732 |
| TGL2 | | | 5.226 |
| ATG15 | | | |
Clustering results obtained by Resnik's method
| Threshold | Initial | 5.226 | 4.726 |
Clustering
Result |
|
|
|
Annotation information for ATG15 and TGL1:
Yellow term annotates both genes ATG15 and TGL1. Green term annotates gene TGL1.
Annotation information for ATG15 and TGL2:
Red term annotates gene ATG15. Green term annotates gene TGL2.
Analysis:
The annotation information for TGL1, TGL2 and ATG15 in the above figures shows that term GO:0016298 annotates
both genes TGL1 and ATG15.
On the other hand, GO:0004806 which annotates gene TGL2 is a child term of GO:0016298.
Because the similarity value between ATG15 and TGL1 is so close to the similarity value between
ATG15 and TGL2, it is hard to determine which method provides a better measurement based on the annotation information.
Conclusion:
Both methods are equal.