Similarity values obtained by G-SESAME
| | DAL1 | DAL2 | DAL3 | DUR1,2 |
| DAL1 | | 0.512 | 0.512 | 0.419 |
| DAL2 | | | 0.728 | 0.419 |
| DAL3 | | | | 0.419 |
| DUR1,2 | | | | |
Clustering results obtained by G-SESAME
| Threshold | Initial | 0.720 | 0.510 | 0.410 |
Clustering
Result |
|
|
|
|
Similarity values obtained by Resnik's method
| | DAL1 | DAL2 | DAL3 | DUR1,2 |
| DAL1 | | 2.469 | 2.469 | 1.740 |
| DAL2 | | | 5.221 | 1.740 |
| DAL3 | | | | 1.740 |
| DUR1,2 | | | | |
Clustering results obtained by Resnik's method
| Threshold | Initial | 5.222 | 2.422 | 1.722 |
Clustering
Result |
|
|
|
|
Analysis:
The similarity values and clustering results obtained by Resnik's method are very similar to those obtained by G-SESAME.
Conclusion:
Both methods are equal.