Similarity values obtained by G-SESAME
| | GLG2 | TOA2 | GSY2 | GSY1 | GLC3 |
| GLG2 | | 0.096 | 0.804 | 0.804 | 0.535 |
| TOA2 | | | 0.096 | 0.096 | 0.126 |
| GSY2 | | | | 1 | 0.535 |
| GSY1 | | | | | 0.535 |
| GLC3 | | | | | |
Clustering results obtained by G-SESAME
| Threshold | Initial | 1.000 | 0.800 | 0.530 | 0.120 |
Clustering
Result |
|
|
|
|
|
Similarity values obtained by Resnik's method
| | GLG2 | TOA2 | GSY2 | GSY1 | GLC3 |
| GLG2 | | 0.281 | 6.773 | 6.773 | 4.456 |
| TOA2 | | | 0.281 | 0.281 | 0 |
| GSY2 | | | | 7.217 | 4.456 |
| GSY1 | | | | | 4.456 |
| GLC3 | | | | | |
Clustering results obtained by Resnik's method
| Threshold | Initial | 7.218 | 6.718 | 4.418 | 0.218 |
Clustering
Result |
|
|
|
|
|
Analysis:
The similarity values and clustering results obtained by Resnik's method are very similar to those obtained by G-SESAME.
Conclusion:
Both methods are equal.